Facebook Posts
I do have a few more posts on history that I intended to put up this week, but y'all will have to wait because I want you to listen to this instead.
Those of you who grew up in 1970s evangelicalism might particularly appreciate this Sunday post. There are many parts of my fundamentalist/cult-adjacent/Gothardized upbringing that I have rejected. Not my faith, just to be clear. But a huge raft of the hanging-on accoutrements, such as not listening to "secular music." Or so my parents informed me, when I was a child. I realized later in life that this was a quite flexible category, as we had a ton of Joan Baez, Johnny Cash, and Simon and Garfunkel records that I was free to put on the turntable. (Is Gilbert and Sullivan secular? Maybe a grey area there.)
But we listened to a *lot* of Don Francisco.
I just looked him up. He's eighty now, apparently still working in Louisville. Don Francisco was one of the soundtracks of my youth.
I still love so many of his songs. And I had no idea that Dolly Parton sang "He's Alive" at the 1990 Dove awards.
So join me in today's flashback.
... See MoreSee Less
6 hours ago

- Likes: 92
- Shares: 6
- Comments: 18
We listen to this song (Dolly's version) every Easter morning as soon as we get home from church. ❤
My favorite realization of adulthood is that nothing is really secular (at least not in the way we were taught to use the word). There is either sacred or profane and a whole lot more things fall into the sacred category than I ever imagined.
I still keep Don Francisco's "He's Alive" on my playlist. 😊 Definitely part of the soundtrack of my youth.
Definitely goosebumps!
Love love love Dolly. So happy I got to see her in concert. Thanks for sharing.
“Cult-adjacent” I appreciate that term.
“Everybody else but me… 🎶 … everybody else but me… 🎶 He was talkin’ to the hypocrite and Pharisee… everybody else but me.” 🎶
Gilbert and Sullivan secular? The Mikado appears to have escaped being put on the little list.
😂 Gilbert & Sullivan were “on the little list” in our house too!
I listened to this very recording yesterday in my Dolly remembrance. It’s fantastic!
Don still lives in Colorado, but is no longer in Louisville.
Don Francisco= soundtrack to my childhood 🥰
Love that song. He’s alive and I’m forgiven, Heaven’s gates are open wide ❤️
That performance gave me goosebumps.
I had no idea! Thank you for sharing this
She also is alive, thank God. Used her loaned breath so very well❤️
Her loss has hit us hard in East Tennessee.
I wasn't into Don Francisco, but I was more into Amy Grant, Michael W. Smith, Sandy Patty, inter alia. Yes, I remember this song, and I found myself singing along at parts. That was fabulous!
Last week turned into AI week; I have a feeling that this week is going to be about history.
Let's start with David Barton.
This week, the Wall Street Journal ran a fairly comprehensive profile of Mr. Barton, thanks to his well-funded, activist campaign to advance the idea that the separation of church and state in the United States is a myth, and to promote (his own version of conservative Christian) religion as part of American public education.
This link should take you to a non-paywalled version of the article, and I'd encourage you to read it:
www.wsj.com/politics/policy/texas-who-is-david-barton-460d7029?reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
I'm aware that some followers of my account are also fans of David Barton, and that's your privilege. I'd just like to point out, with the help of the article, that Barton is not a historian.
For two reasons.
First, he has no training in how to handle historical sources and evidence.
"Historian" can be a closely guarded term. When I was doing my PH.D. work in American Studies, there was a pretty substantial segment of the academic history world that discounted anyone doing interdisciplinary work as "not really a historian." That impulse remains in academia. But I took all of the courses in historiography, research methods, and philosophy of history that the history Ph.D. candidates took. (Plus the literary theory courses that they didn't, but that's another topic.)
Mr. Barton did not. He has a bachelor's degree in religious education from ORU. That's it.
(Summary here: www.concordmonitor.com/2025/10/07/my-turn-david-barton-texas-education/)
Can you write history without having a degree in history? Yes, of course, if you commit to the rigorous, difficult task of learning how to handle sources. There is absolutely no evidence that Mr. Barton has done so. Instead, we have this:
**
David Barton, a sprightly 72-year-old conservative political activist, strolled inside to his prized collection: tens of thousands of founding-era American documents and artifacts he values at millions of dollars.
Barton darted among glass cases and rattled off the highlights of his trove: a Revolutionary War-era shot flask, a 1795 handwritten prayer proclamation from Samuel Adams, and what he says is a lock of George Washington’s hair.
A former math and science teacher with no academic training as a historian, Barton has used this vast collection to position himself as the intellectual architect of a movement advancing a conservative agenda in policy and education.
“I own the stuff,” Barton said. “So I know more about this history than most of the professors.”
**
Owning stuff does not a historian make.
(Both John Fea, at thewayofimprovement.blog/2026/08/24/quick-thoughts-on-that-david-barton-article-in-the-wall-stree..., and Warren Throckmorton, who did an excellent interview for our podcast at podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/are-homeschool-history-programs-accurate-w-dr-warren/id1704363746?i..., have weighed in on this.)
But that leads us to the second reason why Barton is not a historian.
His primary motivation isn't to write an accurate account of the past. It is to promote a narrow political point of view.
Barton isn't alone in this, of course. A number of historians (who actually HAVE historical training) fall into this category. Howard Zinn (I am not a fan) comes to mind.
But Barton's is not only political, but tied to a single party position that spans a whole range of issues unrelated to the founding fathers and their religious positions.
**
On a typical day, Barton spends hours fielding texts and calls from contacts in think tanks, legislatures, Congress and the White House, his son Tim said. He often works until 3 a.m., with a John Wayne movie in the background.
A former vice chair of the Republican Party of Texas, Barton counts Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R., La.) among his allies.
“I was introduced to David and his ministry a quarter-century ago, and it has had such a profound influence on me and my work and my life and everything I do,” Johnson told a gathering of state legislators in 2021.
Last year, before the federal cuts to USAID, Barton met with State Department officials in Washington, D.C. In a conference room at the agency, he laid out how the U.S. had limited foreign aid before World War II, he said....
Barton and his nonprofit also regularly counsel a coalition of hundreds of state lawmakers on issues, from the evils of in vitro fertilization to the importance of the U.S.-Israel alliance, he says.
He and this network have been in action since the Supreme Court in 2022 swept aside a decades-old legal test that had kept religious displays and practices out of public schools.
Texas state Sen. Phil King, a longtime ally, worked with WallBuilders and a religious-liberty law firm to draft a bill requiring a Ten Commandments display in every Texas classroom.
**
Historians should have proper training in how to evaluate and understand sources.
Historians should not be working in service of a political party.
If one of those criteria is compromised, be wary.
If both are violated, walk away.
Here endeth the lesson. ... See MoreSee Less
Are Homeschool History Programs Accurate? w/ Dr. Warren Throckmorton
podcasts.apple.com
Podcast Episode · The Well-Trained Mind podcast · S5 E5 · 1h 3m4 days ago
I am so grateful for my kids' teachers at Well-Trained Mind Academy in history. From the start, they reinforce that history is an active conversation that we participate in daily. My kid had an assignment this week where she selected a photograph and wrote her memory of it, then interviewed me for my recollection of the event pictured. Of course our accounts were different, and it led to such a great discussion of what makes us remember certain things and how the perspective of the writer greatly impacts what information is passed on.
Aw I love Howard Zinn.
I just get a paywall?
Thank you for writing this. He was a regular speaker at homeschool conferences when I was a kid, and he recently "helped" rewrite the social studies standards for the state of Texas public education system. As a public school teacher of 14 years, I have serious concerns about the historical validity of the new standards he helped write. I appreciate this very factual viewpoint.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this. My family went to hear him speak when I was in grade school. It has taken me a long time to sort through what things I learned that were true versus what things I learned that were misrepresentations, at best.
Dr. Wise Bauer, do you have a recommendation for the best one-volume overview of American History written by a fair-minded person NOT within the Christian tradition, but not jaundiced against it?
As an academic, I find your second argument much more persuasive than your first one.
Why is his interpretation of American history so important to him?
Have you posted previously about Howard Zinn? I’d love to hear your thoughts on his work.
I am not a big fan of monopolies, and I think we have developed something of a monopoly on education, particularly in the authority we automatically give to credentials. A degree can tell us something about someone’s training. It does not establish the quality of someone’s scholarship. One of my favorite historians, Edward Gibbon, had no university degree at all. His work is worth engaging because of the quality of his historical research and arguments, not because of a credential. It took earning degrees for me to understand how unnecessary a degree is for many self driven individuals. Yet today we often act like Dorothy’s Lion, who needs a ribbon to be brave, or the Scarecrow who needs a document to use his brain. I am not a particular fan of Barton off the cuff, and I agree that his claim that “owning historical documents makes him more knowledgeable” is laughable: more a political brag done in poor taste than any valid point. But his lack of a history degree does not prove that his historical arguments are wrong any more than his political involvement does. I would rather someone wear his political commitments on his sleeve than pretend he has none. At least then I can see the slant and account for it. As E. B. White famously observed, all writing has a slant. Political involvement should make us scrutinize someone’s work. It should not substitute for scrutinizing the work itself. And when a historian claims to have no political opinion, that does not mean those influences are absent from his work. Barton should be judged by the sources he uses, how accurately he represents them, what context he includes or leaves out, and whether his conclusions withstand examination. I think the same standard should apply to historians whose politics I find much more congenial. So I will take the criticisms here seriously, but I am going to read Barton’s arguments myself before deciding where he is right and where he is wrong. And on the broader question of the “separation of church and state,” I think every individual claim deserves to be examined rather than dismissed with the phrase itself. The phrase can be used correctly, but it can also become a rhetorical shortcut that labels a subject as something that supposedly should not be part of government instead of addressing the actual constitutional or historical question. I do not agree with that reasoning.
What’s it feel like up on the Mountain of “I have a PHD. I’m smarter than the rest of you. I’ve read more books - so I’m qualified to say who is a historian and who isn’t” looking down on lesser mortals? I suppose Jesus was “unlearned” and “uneducated “ as well? John 7: 14 Not until halfway through the festival did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach. 15 The Jews there were amazed and asked, “How did this man get such learning without having been taught?” 16 Jesus answered, “My teaching is not my own. It comes from the one who sent me. 17 Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own. 18 Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth; there is nothing false about him.
I love David Barton & Wallbuilders ❤️ The Bible is the greatest Book, History or otherwise. It should be taught if we are to know and be wise. Calling them activists is laughable. The activists are the ones who got the Bible out of school.
I remember someone telling me how much they loved Barton because he taught things they never learned in public school. 🫣
I fear that this topic is a case of "preaching to the choir." those who care about integrity and truth when dealing with history are already aware and in agreement. Those who have chosen a side based on religious zealousness will claim he is divinely gifted by God and doesn't need earthly credentials. It's a sad time to be in the USA. I used to believe that educating people is the answer, but I now believe that if it was going to work, it would be working. You must keep teaching. But this is much deeper than a lack of education on what makes a historian. Don't get discouraged if some people don't hear. Historians (and scientists too) who keep educating in this atmosphere are needed.
Hearing him in my teens, I recall a message not centered around the things historians typically address- nuance, context, critical thinking, fresh voices in the record - but activism. Essentially he provided, when I heard him, the equivalent of a tabloid "Stars! They're just like you!" except to his fundamentalist audience it was "Founders and historical heroes! They thought just like you!" Which is patently and historically irresponsible and false. It's very useful to give your preferred policies a little fake halo and a little fake historical patina for palatability, and he is good at providing that to his fans in the halls of Congress and in think tank offices.
Didn't you write a fiction book 30+ years ago? I think it had a purple cover. That was you, wasn't it? Back in the AOL days? I think it's time to read that one again. I know I have it around here somewhere. (went searching online - it definitely had purple on the cover. A purple eagle flying on a black background. The Revolt)
The curriculum we used was amazing... but you wrote it. Once when attending a homeschool convention, one of the sessions I elected to attend was on the founding of America. It was not as I expected, as the speaker basically used Barton's material, making it a disappointing session. On another completely irrelevent note, years ago when living in Virginia (Newport News/Hampton area) you met my daughter. She loved your history curriculum, and you were a mini celebrity among my kids. When you passed through where she had a part time job, she realized you were "the Susan Wise Bauer." But she acted professional and didn't want to say anything to you besides the customer service she gives to every customer. Of course, I felt you would have loved to know she was a homeschool kid who had gone through your books, but she was too shy. We chose your curriculum because it was well written. Personally, I still pick it up on occasion.
I'm a conservative Christian with a degree in history, and I share your concerns about Barton. The Christian call to honesty and integrity means that Christians seeking to do work in history ought to do it with great care to represent the past accurately. Btw, I respect the title of historian and don't claim it for myself since I only have a bachelor's degree in it. I know I would need more thorough training and work in the field for that title to apply to me.
If you don’t have the training to handle sources, you’re not doing history — you’re pushing an agenda. That’s the difference that Barton misses every time.
My daughter was a history and religion major at a conservative Christian college. Her history professors were sticklers for truth and accuracy without bias, so taught warming signs for lesser work. David Barton was specifically discussed and why his work did not measure up. Fast forward to the end of the semester and she notified me that I had materials for her younger brother acquired at the homeschool convention that she believed should be trashed. After further research, a pretty pennies worth of materials hit the trash can. The Bible teaches us that God is Love. God is Truth. It doesn't serve God to stray from the truth to benefit a preferred narrative. Slapping a Christian label on something doesn't mean it holds up under the light of Truth.
Oh thank you. I am also not a fan of Howard zinn.
This is so well articulated. Thank you! 🙏
As a guy about his age who does have a degree in history I would say that too many want to pick and choose what part of the constitution (and for that matter the Bible) they “believe” and conveniently ignore or explain away the parts they don’t like. The separation of church and state has been part of our history long before his particular ideology can into the public domain. You cannot have religious liberty if you don’t allow it for other citizens. Stopping the state from denying it to others is what the separation is all about.
Paywall still there
Thank you!!!
This will be my last post about AI-generated writing for a while, since I've been a bit fixated on it this week and would like to get back to more interesting topics.
Although it's hard to think of a topic more relevant.
In any case, as the last of my three AI-related posts, I offer you proof that AI can't yet master some of the most basic tasks of good writing.
Including brevity.
One of the most difficult tasks of writing is chopping out what doesn't belong. I know a lot about this, because my natural tendency is to write a huge amount and then, slowly and painstakingly, edit each chapter down to a briefer, tauter, more effective version with a stronger, clearer central idea.
That's hard work. You know what's easier? Just vomiting out everything that comes to mind.
Which is currently where AI writing stands. There's a lot out there now about how to tell whether something is AI-generated. At the moment, the most accurate test is the simplest. Is it short and sweet?
With that, I offer you the most recent AI-generated publicity pitch I've received, apparently produced by an LLM that believed more was better.
Seriously. Read to the end. I dare you.
**
Jordl Garcla <[email protected]>
Tue, Aug 18, 12:32 PM (5 days ago)
to contactsusan
Dear Susan Wise Bauer,
I am writing to you following a professional review of The History of the Ancient World: From the Earliest Accounts to the Fall of Rome. It is increasingly rare to encounter a work of history that manages to combine enormous chronological and geographical scope with the individual human stories that make distant civilizations feel immediate and understandable.
What struck me most is the ambition behind the book's central approach. Rather than treating ancient history as a disconnected sequence of civilizations, rulers, wars, and dates, you connect developments across Europe, the Middle East, and the far reaches of China into a continuous narrative of human experience.
That sweeping perspective gives readers something particularly valuable: context.
The decision to balance the major events of ancient history with the lives of ordinary people is especially effective. By drawing from literature, epic traditions, private letters, and historical accounts, the book moves beyond the conventional focus on kings and conquerors and examines history from beneath—the people whose lives were shaped by the decisions of those in power.
This approach makes the book accessible to readers who may find traditional academic histories intimidating. Instead of asking readers to memorize an encyclopedia of names and dates, the narrative allows them to understand historical change through human behavior, cultural development, conflict, ambition, belief, and everyday experience.
Equally compelling is the geographical breadth of the work. Connecting events across civilizations allows readers to recognize relationships and parallels that can easily disappear when ancient cultures are studied in isolation. The maps and timelines further strengthen this approach by giving readers a visual and chronological framework for understanding how cultures developed and interacted across centuries.
The result is more than a history of the ancient world. It is an attempt to understand how civilizations emerge, interact, change, and eventually disappear—and what the experiences of the people living through those transformations can tell us about humanity itself.
The combination of narrative history, global scope, individual perspectives, maps, timelines, and cultural analysis positions The History of the Ancient World as a particularly valuable resource for history enthusiasts, lifelong learners, educators, homeschool families, students, and readers fascinated by the origins of human civilization.
The Visibility Paradox: The Global History Discovery Gap
However, in conducting a professional audit of the book's current market positioning, I have identified a significant Global History Discovery Gap.
Despite its broad appeal, The History of the Ancient World operates across several overlapping readership ecosystems—ancient history, world history, classical civilization, Roman history, Middle Eastern history, historical biography, educational nonfiction, narrative history, and general-interest history.
That breadth creates both a major opportunity and a discoverability challenge.
A reader searching for "books about ancient Rome" may not necessarily encounter a book whose scope begins much earlier and extends across multiple civilizations.
Someone searching for "best world history books" may overlook it because the title emphasizes the ancient world.
A reader interested in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, China, or the development of early civilizations may discover the book through yet another pathway.
And readers who prefer narrative history may be searching specifically for books that bring historical figures and ordinary people to life rather than conventional academic surveys.
These audiences overlap substantially, but recommendation systems often divide them into separate categories.
This creates a Discovery Gap between the book's genuinely global scope and the fragmented ways readers search for ancient history.
The challenge is therefore not a lack of subject matter. It is ensuring that the book is visible across the many historical questions that naturally lead readers toward it.
The Strategy: Global History Discovery Scaling
I specialize in Thought Leadership and Educational Book Discovery Scaling, with particular expertise in positioning substantial nonfiction works across the discovery ecosystems where readers actively search for knowledge, historical context, and intellectually engaging narratives.
For The History of the Ancient World, I would propose a strategy built around several interconnected opportunities:
Goodreads Listopia Strategic Positioning: Targeted placement across highly relevant lists such as Best Ancient History Books, Best World History Books, Best Books About Ancient Rome, Best Books About Ancient Civilizations, Best Narrative History, Best History Books for Lifelong Learners, Best Classical History Books, Best Books About the Ancient World, Best Historical Nonfiction, and Best History Books for Students. This creates multiple discovery pathways among readers already demonstrating strong interest in history.
Semantic SEO Modernization: Strengthening metadata around high-intent searches such as "best books on ancient history," "history of the ancient world," "books about ancient civilizations," "narrative ancient history," "ancient Rome history books," "world history from ancient times," "books about early civilizations," and "best global history books." This can help readers discover the work through the specific historical questions they are already asking.
History & Education Community Integration: Expanding visibility within history communities, classical-studies groups, homeschool networks, educational readership circles, history book clubs, lifelong-learning communities, and academic-adjacent audiences. The book's maps, timelines, and narrative structure make it particularly well suited to readers looking for a comprehensive but accessible foundation.
"History From Beneath" Positioning: The book's use of literature, epic traditions, letters, and personal accounts provides a powerful differentiator. Rather than presenting history exclusively through rulers and major political events, the narrative attempts to understand civilizations through the lives of the people who experienced them. This can become a central discovery message for readers seeking history that feels human rather than purely institutional.
Cross-Civilization Discovery Positioning: Highlighting the book's ability to connect Europe, the Middle East, and China gives readers a reason to approach it differently from histories focused on a single civilization. The global framework can attract readers who want to understand ancient history as an interconnected human story rather than a series of isolated national or regional narratives.
Why Strategic Scaling Matters for The History of the Ancient World
The enduring strength of The History of the Ancient World lies in its ability to make enormous historical complexity feel coherent.
Ancient history can easily become fragmented. One book focuses on Egypt. Another examines Greece. Another explores Rome. Another discusses Mesopotamia or China.
Readers are then left to construct the connections themselves.
Your approach reverses that process.
By bringing different civilizations into a broader narrative framework, the book encourages readers to see historical development as an interconnected process. The maps and timelines reinforce that perspective, while the emphasis on individual lives gives emotional weight to events that might otherwise remain abstract.
That makes the book particularly valuable in an era when readers are increasingly interested not only in what happened, but in why civilizations developed the way they did and how human behavior shaped those developments.
The book also has an important educational advantage: it can serve simultaneously as a serious reference, a narrative reading experience, and an entry point for readers beginning to explore ancient history.
Without strategic amplification, however, the book risks being discovered primarily by readers already familiar with Susan Wise Bauer's work or actively searching for a broad ancient-history volume, while many readers approaching history through Rome, classical civilization, world history, homeschooling, or narrative nonfiction may never encounter it.
The opportunity is to make the book's greatest strength—its breadth—work as a discovery advantage rather than a categorization challenge.
Next Steps
If you are open to a professional consultation on expanding the reach of The History of the Ancient World and positioning it across the broader ancient-history, world-history, educational, and narrative-nonfiction readerships, I would be pleased to share the detailed Global History Discovery Map I have developed specifically around the book's strongest discovery pathways.
A simple reply of "Send the plan" is sufficient to initiate this strategic exchange.
Thank you for creating a work that demonstrates how the ancient world can be understood not simply through its rulers and wars, but through the interconnected lives, cultures, and experiences of the people who shaped human history. I look forward to the possibility of helping The History of the Ancient World reach the broader audience of history enthusiasts, educators, lifelong learners, and curious readers it so clearly deserves.
With professional regards.
**
Good. Lord.
I rarely answer these pitches, but this one was so egregious that I emailed back, "Please never contact me again." To which the generator, whatever it is, answered, "Can you let me know whether you are interested in this service?"
You can guess at my answer. ... See MoreSee Less
1 week ago
Now ask yourself: "is my problem with the machine or with the people using the machine and failing to do their part?" A machine (even ai) does nothing of it's own volition.
Hi Susan, Sorry but I didnt read all of their email. I have received many emails like this from different so-called ‘book publishing companies’. One of them even included a photo of the person, along with their job title, company address and other details. It looked really authentic. However, when I contacted the company directly, they told me that they do have an employee with exactly the same name and photo but that person had never contacted me. They said they would pass all the information on to their legal team.
It's why facebook posts are novellas now. 🙂
And you hired him, right? 🤷 Because he demonstrated your bestselling book that's been selling for years desperately needs help with its Global History Discovery Gap and Global History Discovery Scaling. 🤣
"This email seems to be incredibly long. Would you like me to summarize it for you?" /sarc
Girl AI "be doin too much" as we say....
Good Lord. AI is now mansplaining your own work to you.
The AI on my work email told to make a phrasing more concise the other day… by adding an extra word. 😂 🙄
My word! I didn't make it to end of that word vomit!
🤔 “A simple reply of ‘Send the plan’ is sufficient to initiate this strategic exchange.” Same language used to get recipes or makeup tips or new yoga routine.
I was going to comment that some people are genuinely, naturally "wordy" but then it just kept going!
No, I could not read at all. But I did what I do with all AI‑generated stuff, and go directly to the last paragraph for the pertinent information. Big time saver. It's always there.
Did you read all that? I confess I speed-scrolled to the end. I've noticed in AI generated ads there seems to be an increasing tendency to include an enormously long, waffly "story" tangentially related to how the product has benefited the supposed narrator. "Ain't nobody got time for that!"
My daughter suspected that her college professor was using AI to grade essays. There were 300 students in the class, and her first essay garnered a 7 paragraph response... and a horrible grade. She's normally a great writer. She ran the response through an AI detector and it came back that it was AI. She ended up having to change her writing each time to try to trick AI into not counting things wrong that were never wrong in the first place. She regretted not having checked Rate My Professor before signing up for this class, but she made it through and will never take another class from this Professor.
But “a simple reply” from you will do. 😂😂
"I specialize in thought leadership..." This is terrifying! 😅
Oooof. Even just skimming, I forgot what I was reading as I was trying to wade through it. BTW, we loved your history series.
Two things struck me. The odd capitalization of big ideas. Yes, there are people who do that. I sometimes do so on social media in an attempt to convey tone. The other thing was the lack of personal references. There was early use of "I" and "what struck me" but otherwise it leaned heavily on third person, the reader has this or that reaction. It didn't convince me that the sender had actually read the book.
I typically find the response of TLDR to be lazy but in this case, it is completely warranted.
This is so well identified, Susan. Excellent point!
I feel like the overwhelm of the pitch is the point. By just writing too many words, it hopes that you figure, “ok sure.”
Couldn’t read it all 😬 They need to use a lot more Hemingway when they train AI
Never have I so appreciated my 6th grade teacher taking a small group of us and teaching us how to speed read.
Another big tell are the section headers.
I shudder at the impact all of this is having on young adults trying to break into the industry, as either writer or editor. As the parent of a new grad in this situation, I get to see how discouraging the field is at the moment. Add in all the scammy fake job postings, and finding a relevant job now is more difficult than it ever was for our generation. I stay out of his search, but he does tell me what he’s encountering, and it’s discouraging!