Facebook Posts
I want to weigh in on our current hostilities.
No, not the American military against Iran: the White House against the American media.
In case you’ve been under a rock, President Trump has barred CNN, MS NOW (previously MSNBC), and Politico from their long-standing place in the White House television press pool (a system that’s been in place since the early 1940s), because he disagrees with their coverage of his administration.
A First Amendment lawsuit is pending, so we’ll see how this plays out.
In the meantime, let me offer my small-potatoes take on the best way to respond to negative public coverage/comments/criticism.
I am not the president of the United States. (Yet.)
(THAT was a joke)
But I’m also no stranger to public, often stinging, often negative, and in my view, often inaccurate coverage. My first book came out in 1996. Since then, I’ve been called a fundamentalist, a communist, a socialist, a right-wing fanatic, a fake historian with a religious agenda, a radical feminist, a Christian nutcase, and a few other things that I can’t be bothered to resurrect at this late date.
There are three ways that someone with a public profile can respond to negative coverage from journalists, reviewers, news sites, and random loudmouths on social media sites.
First, and probably the right choice 90% of the time, you can ignore it and carry on with your work. That’s primarily what we’re called to do: Our work. if you carry on with what you’re meant to be doing, and if that work is meaningful, the negative and positives will shake themselves out. It’s difficult to ignore the negatives. Ignoring them is, generally speaking, the only way to keep doing your meaningful work. Otherwise, you get caught in a spiralling reaction system and the work goes away because all of your energy is being spent on the reactions.
Second, you can push back privately. Sometimes this is a necessary correction. A couple of years ago, a well-known journalist writing for a major evangelical Christian publication put out an opinion piece in which he described me as a “right wing culture warrior.” I don’t do culture wars, and, given the platform, I didn’t feel like I could ignore that. I contacted him, sent him the specific reasons why I felt this was an unfair characterization, and asked him to reconsider. He sent me back a quite snotty response (“mansplaining” comes to mind) which began with all of his academic qualifications. (I also have some of those.) I responded, politely, that none of his qualifications made the characterization accurate, but that if he and his organization chose to stand behind the phrase, I would be happy to publish my own thoughts on why it was 100% wrong.
The piece disappeared the next day. I don’t know who made that decision, but clearly someone with more authority than the journalist had a look at the essay and recognized the problem.
Third, you can object publicly—by providing actual information showing why the assertions made in the coverage are incorrect. When you’re dealing with opinion pieces, this is often not easy to do. At that point, you should revert to the first strategy.
You know what doesn’t generally work?
Yelling that everyone who criticizes you is unfair and biased and refusing to speak to them. Name calling instead of offering substantive rebuttals. Going on the offensive and shutting down access. Putting all your energies into the coverage instead of into your job.
And that’s just from me, the private citizen.
www.cbsnews.com/news/presidential-tv-pool-suspended-trump-ban-cnn/
www.nytimes.com/2026/09/21/opinion/trump-journalists-ban-white-house.html?unlocked_article_code=1...
Opinion | Trump Is Attacking Press Freedom and Disregarding the Law. Again. (Gift Article)
www.nytimes.com
The new ban continues Mr. Trump’s attempt to prevent the free flow of information in American society.22 hours ago
I would vote for you.
Excellent points! Both sides of the aisle should be concerned about the implications of this and the first amendment!
Yeah I’ve had my share of negative press too but your words are wise here… sometimes just keep moving and working.
Fourth option: remove privileged access to those who abuse the opportunity to be physically on the White House grounds, and allow others who won't abuse that privilege the opportunity. Nobody's right to publish what they want has been taken away. What has been taken away is the presumption that they can do so from within the White House. That's a privilege that carries a responsibility. It is not a right. The SCOTUS has ruled that it is not a right previously.
Right to the point as usual. Wonderful. All anyone ever asks is proof of facts and no trying to to hide the truth with false accusations!
Well said!
THIS. I mean, all of it, but especially the part about objecting publicly with facts. Shrieking that the coverage is false doesn't make it so. If the truth is on your side, shout THAT from the rooftops, not ad hominem attacks and unsubstantiated accusations of falsehoods. Also, for what it's worth, when I homeschooled my kids, they learned about John Peter Zenger.
It’s inconceivable what is happening!!! 🤯 Thank you sharing your thoughts!!
I would hope someone at some point will discuss the difference between “rights” and “privilege”. It is amazing how varied a story can be told by two different people exposed to the same information at the same time. Then, these same people, come out of their press seat, and write two diametrically opposed stories using an answer given at a press conference, which was televised and aired to the public. Those who blatantly lie or twist an answer so maliciously shouldn’t have a “right” to take up space in the press room. They can hear the press conference and report from the live feed. Some of those reporters reprimanded are verbally contentious, and redirect questions which downright attack the current President and the current government. I say their misbehavior is a matter of national security, whether or not those reporters actively and openly own their nefarious practices. They are quia distraction, when trying to get the facts of the story. It seems they are only there to throw daggers and get kudos from their network producers. Being a reporter and disseminating truth is a huge responsibility, and should be taken seriously. Those who are there to throw gotcha questions should be looked upon as the unserious jokesters they portend. As it is now, they are collecting feathers in their caps and attaboys for trying to trip up the news cycle, trying to create news. They are just getting points from their own networks, but their behavior is not at all demonstrating a serious investigative journalist.
Obama did the same thing to Fox News in 2009. THE VERY SAME THING. Did that bother you? Or do you even remember it?
Often the media is completely wrong. Even with local personal interest kind of stories. I can't stand any of the outlets. I wish there was something we could listen to and get middle of the road, reasonable news.
Hi! 📚 We’re currently putting together our September–November Author Showcase and would love to consider featuring your work with our reading community. If you’re interested, feel free to DM us, and we’ll be happy to share the details. We’d love to connect!
I totally forgot to do my reading roundup at the end of August, so here it is, a little late.
Odd set of books last month, and more disappointment than I’d hoped for. Physical books first:
Jennifer Weiner, BIG SUMMER. This was another airport purchase. (Must be really good for your royalties to have your book out front at airport bookshops, as that’s typically where I buy big soapy novels in hardback that otherwise I’d never pick up.) After my less-than-stellar experience with Weiner’s THE GRIFFIN SISTERS’ GREATEST HITS, I thought I’d give her another try. BIG SUMMER will be my last venture for a while. It can’t decide whether it’s a romance, a mystery, or something else, and I had to flog myself into finishing the last third. Also I’m finding that Weiner’s narrators are becoming more or less indistinguishable from each other.
Harlan Coben, PLOT TWIST. I don’t usually buy “how to write” books, and I’m not a Coben reader. But I heard an interview with him about the book which was smart and interesting, so I ordered it. Not my cup of tea. The advice is simplistic and the writing style sets my teeth on edge. On the other hand, every time I put it down, I had the unexplained impulse to go back and work on my own novel some more, so I guess it had some useful side effect.
John Samuel Harphan, THE INTELLECTUAL ORIGINS OF AMERICAN SLAVERY. This bleeds over a bit into my work life, since I’m doing some history work in this direction, but it was an excellent read on its own. The central conundrum for Harphan is how English and American thinkers who prized freedom so highly were able to reconcile this with the massively-scaled slavery industry in the seventeenth century. The primary intellectual gymnastic was to recast all of Africa as a place where life was so wretched and the people so debased that any other fate was preferable to living on that continent. Sadly, I saw quite a bit of this rhetoric when I did my post on the Equal Earth map changes. It’s alive and well.
Ian McEwan, ATONEMENT. This is a reread for me; I’d been thinking about this book because of another essay I’m writing, and I hadn’t read it for twenty years. The reread did not disappoint. There are so many layers to this story—and the prose is so very lovely.
Madeline Miller, CIRCE. I’ve had this one sitting on my shelf for quite a while and finally pulled it off. It has its moments, and the writing is lyrical. But it mostly seemed to me like a retread of Lewis’s TIL WE HAVE FACES, minus any of the insightful spiritual observations or a central character that I actually liked.
And as for ebooks:
Charlie Kirk, THE MAGA DOCTRINE. Yes, that’s part of my ongoing effort to read books I’m pretty sure I won’t agree with, and I could borrow it for free on Kindle. Kirk lost me pretty early on, when he compared Elon Musk to Thomas Edison, the Wright brothers, and Jonas Salk (“These sorts of people, and the divine creative spark they display, are the foundation of American greatness.” That would be Elon Musk’s divine creative spark, just to confirm). But I persisted until I got to this, “While Trump works to avoid the flare-up of total war with Iran, Mitt Romney, regarded by many of the “Never Trump” establishment Republicans as a voice of moderation and respectability, vowed in the early stages of his failed 2012 presidential campaign to take ‘military action’ against Iran to stop its nuclear program if elected—not merely if a crisis arose, simply if elected. A vote for Romney was a vote for war.” That was written by Kirk in 2020. It hasn’t aged well.
Dick Francis, BANKER. I needed a fun horse book for airplane reading. This hit all the requirements—horses, interesting subplot involving the narrator’s day job, a mystery, a hero in peril, and a tidy resolution. I haven’t read Dick Francis for a long time and I might go back and do some relaxing revisiting.
3 days ago
Welp. I *loved* Circe. Admittedly, I am not a very critical reader, and I know that. But now I’ll have to find a copy of Til We Have Faces and see for myself!
Something in particular bothered me about Circe: for a book that was supposedly meant to center women in their stories, the last quarter of the story was obsessed with a man (Odysseus). I've always been a fan of Odysseus, despite his moral failings, and even I was thinking, "Give me a break."
Ian McEwan's On Chesil Beach made me so mad I actually stopped reading (adult) fiction for a decade. Well written, absolutely, but I couldn't handle the level of unresolved trauma and unnecessary tragedy. It's become a core experience for me and how I interact with fiction and my own writing.
I was meh about Circe. Till We Have Faces and LeGuin’s Lavinia are just so superior, other myth retellings feel like chrome to their gold.
I often wonder if we would be engaged in Iran if Charlie Kirk hadn’t been assassinated. I think he was a positive influence on Trump.
I had completely forgotten about Dick Francis! I am adding his books to my list for fun reading!
I noticed you slipped in the little bit about writing a novel! How wonderful. Consider it pre-ordered. 😎
This is helpful. Ty!
I just started Ian McEwan’s What We Can Know, and you’re absolutely right about his way with layering and lovely prose.
Hmmm … I have Circe sitting in my audible library … more a should read vs a want to read … but I’ve been eyeing it and intending to try it this fall. We’ll see how I do. Should reads are tough reads for me to start …
Dick Francis, especially his older books, are my comfort reads. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the others.
Lessons by McEwan was one of my favorites last year. Read Saturday this year. Always a good thoughtful read.
Banker was the first dick francis book I read - it was a book of the month selection in the early 1970s. I downsized books recently and it was one of the few francis books i kept.
Love Dick Francis novels for a fun read
The audiobook for Circe is amazing if anyone needs a good car book.
I totally agree with you about Circe. Forgetable.
From Google AI: Elon Musk is a prominent entrepreneur who has driven major advancements in electric vehicles, private spaceflight, and technology through companies like SpaceX and Tesla. Major Business Ventures and InnovationsSpaceX: Founded in 2002, it achieved the first privately-funded liquid-fueled rocket to reach orbit (Falcon 1 in 2008), pioneered reusable orbital rockets, and developed the Dragon spacecraft for NASA missions. Tesla: Joined as an early investor in 2004 and served as CEO since 2008, transforming the global automotive industry toward sustainable electric transport with vehicles like the Roadster, Model S, and a global network of factories. PayPal (X.com): Co-founded the early online financial services and e-payment company, which sold to eBay in 2002. Zip2: Co-founded his first software company in 1995, providing online city guides for newspapers before its sale in 1999. Other Ventures: Co-founded Neuralink for brain-computer interfaces and founded The Boring Company for tunnel construction, alongside launching xAI.Key Recognition Named Time Magazine and Financial Times Person of the Year in 2021. Elected as a member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2022 for breakthroughs in reusable launch vehicles and sustainable systems. And you don’t think he’s comparable to Edison?
The audiobook for Circe is amazing if anyone needs a good car book.
Hillary Clinton is on video saying the same concerning Iran. In fact- she said she would OBLITERATE THEM. Her words. Look it up. And she spoke again and again about deporting illegals - as did Obama and Chuck Schumer. What changed their tune?
It won't surprise you that I have some reservations about AI-driven education.
**
From the article:
But like chatbots, A.I. in education is proliferating. Alpha already has branches in Miami and Brownsville, Texas, where Elon Musk has built a company town around his SpaceX rocket launch site. The next expansion will bring Alpha’s model to more than a dozen other American cities, including New York City and Orlando, Fla.
“Parents and teachers: We need to embrace this change,” Ms. Price wrote after President Trump signed an executive order pushing A.I. in schools.
**
I actually think that AI drills could be useful in teaching phonics skills and administering computation drills--repetitive, concrete learning tasks that could be more useful if personalized.
But here's the part we need to talk more about:
**
From the article:
At Alpha’s flagship, students spend a total of just two hours a day on subjects like reading and math, using A.I.-driven software. The remaining hours rely on A.I. and an adult “guide,” not a teacher, to help students develop practical skills in areas such as entrepreneurship, public speaking and financial literacy.
**
I tend to shy away from philosophical discussions about WHAT IS EDUCATION? and HOW DO WE FORM THE NEXT GENERATION? and WHAT IS SCHOOL?, in part because I am much more interested in how kids learn how to read, write, and think, and in part because these discussions SO quickly veer into culture-war territority, which I am not only constitutionally uninterested in, but also simply don't have the energy for.
But that statement does stand out to me.
The Alpha "education" is all about practical skills. There's nothing wrong with practical skills. But the curriculum seems to be tilting WAY towards those practical skills.
**
From the article:
Alpha isn’t using A.I. as a tutor or a supplement. It is the school’s primary educational driver to move students through academic content.
In the afternoons, students focus on projects that require interaction with other students, such as wilderness training, cooking and sports. For example, fifth and sixth graders last year decided to create a food truck. To accomplish their goal, they learned how to budget, form a business plan — with the help of a chatbot — and to cook eggs.
“When we were all in the kitchen, it would get really stressful,” Byron said. “Working through that calmly and together is something I really improved on.”
**
Business plans. Teamwork. Great. But when do we learn for the sake of learning? When do we memorize poetry, read fantasy, talk about the difference between socialism and capitalism, contemplate the history of the world?
Will we no longer be doing this in twenty years?
A lot of gaps to be filled in here.
A.I.-Driven Education: Founded in Texas and Coming to a School Near You (Gift Article)
www.nytimes.com
At Austin’s Alpha School, students spend just two hours a day on academics, led by artificial intelligence tools. New Alpha schools are set to open in about a dozen cities this fall.7 days ago
A couple of points: 1) I don't think you necessarily need AI for "personalized" phonics for math drills. We've had all kinds of online learning platforms, for quite awhile, that allow kids to practice with immediate feedback, and can adapt future lessons based on results. (But that's just more basic programming- not AI.) 2) Friendly reminder- don't forget to include math on the list of things we learn "for the sake of learning." 🙂 Math can obviously be "practical" as well, but theoretical math is very much part of the liberal arts tradition...
Have you ever read Isaac Asimov's short story, "The Fun They Had?". I feel like we're headed toward making education into the "teacher" in that story (but only the negative parts).
I spend a lot of time talking to both my oldest child’s co-Op class and my music pedagogy collegiate students about the importance of education as a means to build and shape character and the role of teacher-as-mentor. We have discussed (both groups) the medieval university, the original idea of education as a means to explore the world and gain knowledge that we might know God better, and whether “education as instilling facts and techniques for pragmatic ends” is complete enough as compared to “education to seek truth and wisdom while shaping oneself into a person who can serve others in a variety of vocations.” Ultimately, my senior sighed and said, “I really wish studying classical literature were more practical. Maybe I should have lived in the Middle Ages. Or maybe I could go to Oxford?” I then had to explain that Oxford is definitely not in our family budget. 🤣 One of my college students called back through the door as he left one day, “I realized that I move my head the way my piano teacher in high school did. And I talk like him too. You weren’t kidding when you said that inadvertent mentorship by our character and our traits would turn out to matter…” This is why AI cannot walk us all the way through education: education is not only for practical fact-instilling and training in workplace skills. It should be the formation of who we are. /steps off soap box.
Guess what/ The public school system already has huge gaps! Do you know my 5th grader in Ky, at our local public school spent 2 weeks studying 9/11??? He is 10. They talked about suicide, body parts, killing, horror stories, and more!! They read aloud a novel about 9/11. It was mandated by KY!!! I would much prefer- teaching him reading, writing, spelling, math for 2 hours then let him play! Let him do projects!! Do huge projects!!! Choose art or science or reading (from classics) The Acton Model does include all the discussion and the classics!! Their Quests include deeper learning and projects too!! The the public school has taken on some pretty bizarre values! We know you can’t educate without a value system. AI- AI material- programs can help with personalized math and spelling and grammar lessons for sure- But the school currently in KY offers 0 personalized learning! They have new math and reading curriculum and robotic procedures- The teacher reads the math lesson material word for word to the whole class for 60-90 minutes… No small groups… If you are bored- oh well If you are lost- oh well The teacher can’t individualize- Can’t do small groups.. Math- similar.. They then have another hour of the day for catch up After the mandated time bound lessons- Each teacher must keep pace like a conveyor belt offering lessons! No stopping to explain or create personalize lessons as you see they are needed.. If the class is lost- too bad- the mandated pace rules. Also- recess is gone! Because of the mandates The principals are cutting recess!! 15 minutes The children in our school in KY- Get 15 minutes a day From 840-340pm 1 15 minute recess! One! I went to the principal and discussed it. She could offer 30 or 40 or 45 minutes , but chooses to fill the time with programming- The Math and Reading blocks are mandated currriculum So she has to offer a catch time to do personalized help for the kids… So they lose recess. If they used their 3 hours to teach the kids instead of running curriculum by a standardized pace and words to say They could have adequate recess.. So there is a huge systematic problem!! An Aloha school would solve a lot of problems!!! I love a literature rich classic based education- I have read your books about 20 years ago!! But Alpha sure would be better than the current public school here in my county!!! I would give anything to have 2 hours of academics then the day to play, create, do projects, read, discuss, problem solve!! That is what our homeschooling looked like Plus we read aloud an hour a day!! But Alpha would be soooo much better than what we have!! Dig deeeper into what the day and ma dated time stamped curriculum really is!!
I’m with you.
Some thoughts on the "Rise of A.I." by Ronald H. Card, retired freelance photojournalist in Virginia, age 81. The current, bandied about, so-called, unavoidable A.I. apocalypse, capable of destroying humanity by the end of the decade, is a nonsense hoax created by the gullibility of useful tech-ignorant idiots egotistically clamoring for the spotlight and personal recognition. Dumb-ageddon prevails. I believe that such problems can, and are, rooted in spiritual ignorance, and I believe also, that fools have a right to exist. In cutting to the chase here, I will go on record and say that, in effect, knowledge and information does not exist apart from, for that matter detached from, the (human) personality, or personalities, that psychologically holds the information. There is no knowledge lying around collecting dust, not belonging to human intellect. There simply is no interface between sentient, creative consciousness and machine; physical devices and A.I. human programmed algorithms into A.I. bots, for example. A.I. is limited in scope, depth and reach by the I.Q and thought processes, along with the available knowledge-- information, of the "H.I." human intelligence programming such mechanical devices, no matter what form they take on. Naturally speaking, humans can think, reason, feel emotions, exhibit human traits and characteristics, and, most of all, humans have the power and ability to create their own reality according to their held beliefs. Humans can create as well as procreate--can a machine do that? Human also innately possess the ability to love, which is the prime, sustaining energy force in life, in all of existence. Can A.I., or a bot, love? A.I is naturally not alive, it is artificial. However, A.I. is an extremely useful tool, that's right, a tool, purpose designed to assist humans in performing lightning fast calculations and processing information programmed into its algorithms. Additionally, A.I., no matter what the form taken, requires an electrical power source/supply in order to keep it functioning. If the power source runs down and dies out, so does, in turn, the A.I. system, and mechanism, which becomes a very heavy paper weight. As an interesting aside here, I recall, decades ago, the 1978 book by Jerry Mander, entitled, Four arguments for the elimination of television. Mander argued that many of the problems with T.V. are inherent in the medium and technology itself, which were dangerous in his considered opinion. That T.V. mediates and colonizes experience, diminishing human cognition and creativity, and T.V. exhibits inherent bias and information that distorts reality. Of course, TV was not eliminated. Then along came home computers, the internet and cyberspace along with its many social media platforms with an endless accumulation of shared information, whether good or bad, or in-between. Now along comes A.I. with all its many possibilities, good or bad, or in-between. I recall the early computer adage, called the G.I.G.O principal, meaning, garbage in, garbage out. And G.I.G.O. applies to A.I. All such avenues of information, cast in accordance with the social and technical development of the times in which they appear, provide a two-edged sword, so to speak, in that, not the medium itself, but the human element, with its inherent creative cognition, decides on imbuing the medium with good or bad or indifferent information and intent. Do we, as a society, allow a government, whether democratic or socialistic--communistic, to gather, edit, change, manipulate and control the flow of available public information, thus controlling what people think and do? I certainly do not want my available information controlled before I access it. Do you? I think, as individuals, and as groups of individuals, and also as societies, we must all insist upon the free accessing and interpreting of unrestricted information, and thus, we decide what we wish to believe in, or not, based upon our beliefs, and not those of outside influencers, or governments, sciences, or religions, attempting to manipulate us around to their way of thinking, believing and doing. What do you think?. And in closing, think while it is still legal. I believe in free thought.. -- Ronald H. Card.
Lauri Muse, I totally agree. The public school system has much larger gaps! I am on many teacher forums. Their hands are tied and very little instruction can be done. Kinder teachers are changing diapers, keeping ASD kids from eloping, and following 8 IEPs or more with 27 kids and no aide. Some districts strictly bind teachers to scripted curr. AND, even though that curr. includes objectives, they have to post detailed objectives in large letters tied to standards on the wall for each subject each day for students who cannot yet read! There is zero time for actual instruction, play or personalized instruction. When a special student destroys a classroom, it takes days to get everything in order. It's not even babysitting. Not good for anyone. The Alpha system has improved scores tremendously on all levels and made kids and parents excited and motivated. That is far more successful than pubic schools even though there are gaps. For Alpha, gaps can be fixed. For public, gaps get worse and worse. Alpha is not competing against homeschooling, but public. Look into Alpha more deeply. Your issues can be answered or fixed. To Lauri, I just saw a man-on-the-street segment where young adults were asked what they knew about 9-11. They knew nothing. OTOH, the instruction you described sounds horrible. They should be dealing with why it happened, the history, and why America allowed ourselves to be vulnerable. (I, as a mere accountant at a company conference, knew ten years before 9-11 that the military knew of our vulnerability of planes crashing into buildings.)
